Screener
EMES vs EFFE
Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF vs Harbor Osmosis Emerging Markets Resource Efficient ETF
Key differences
- EFFE is significantly larger than EMES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMES follows a index tracking strategy; EFFE uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMES | EFFE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.69% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $130M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.0% | +28.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.51% | 19.37% |
| Max drawdown | -12.98% | -13.75% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMES and EFFE
Explore further