Screener
EMES vs EMGF
Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF vs iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- EMGF costs 0.39% less per year.
- EMGF is significantly larger than EMES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMES follows a index tracking strategy; EMGF uses index enhanced.
- EMGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMES | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +43.9% | +51.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +10.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.22 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.75% | 19.85% |
| Max drawdown | -12.98% | -40.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMES and EMGF
Explore further