Screener
EMES vs EMXC
Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF
Key differences
- EMXC costs 0.40% less per year.
- EMXC is significantly larger than EMES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMES | EMXC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.25% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $22.1B |
| Since | 2025 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.27% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.0% | +65.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +27.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +12.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.25 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.51% | 21.14% |
| Max drawdown | -12.98% | -42.81% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMES and EMXC
Explore further