Screener
EMES vs MAPP
Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF vs Harbor Multi-Asset Explorer ETF
Key differences
- EMES costs 0.15% less per year.
- EMES is classified as equity, while MAPP is mixed asset — different risk/return profiles.
- EMES follows a index tracking strategy; MAPP uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMES | MAPP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $11M |
| Since | 2025 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.83% |
| Asset class | equity | mixed asset |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.0% | +21.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.51% | 8.97% |
| Max drawdown | -12.98% | -12.92% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMES and MAPP
Explore further