Screener
EMES vs SEEM
Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF vs SEI Select Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
- SEEM costs 0.05% less per year.
- SEEM is significantly larger than EMES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMES follows a index tracking strategy; SEEM uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMES | SEEM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.60% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $535M |
| Since | 2025 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 2.72% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.0% | +51.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.51% | 19.46% |
| Max drawdown | -12.98% | -14.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMES and SEEM
Explore further