Screener
EMGF vs EMES
iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF vs Harbor Emerging Markets Select ETF
Key differences
- EMGF costs 0.39% less per year.
- EMGF is significantly larger than EMES — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMGF follows a index enhanced strategy; EMES uses index tracking.
- EMGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMGF | EMES | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.26% | 0.65% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.7B | $11M |
| Since | 2015 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 2.15% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | — |
| Strategy | index enhanced | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +51.7% | +43.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.8% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.22 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.85% | 20.75% |
| Max drawdown | -40.23% | -12.98% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMGF and EMES
Explore further