Screener
EMKT vs GLIX
Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Lazard Listed Infrastructure ETF
Key differences
- EMKT costs 0.22% less per year.
- EMKT is significantly larger than GLIX — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMKT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMKT | GLIX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.74% | 0.96% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $156M | $27M |
| Since | 2013 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -14.21% | -7.82% |
Similar to EMKT and GLIX
Explore further