Screener
EMKT vs THMZ
Lazard Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Lazard Equity Megatrends ETF
Key differences
- THMZ costs 0.24% less per year.
- EMKT is significantly larger than THMZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMKT follows a index tracking strategy; THMZ uses active selection.
- EMKT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMKT | THMZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.74% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $156M | $51M |
| Since | 2013 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.88% | 0.42% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +15.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.66% |
| Max drawdown | -14.21% | -15.99% |
Similar to EMKT and THMZ
Explore further