Screener
EMM vs CGGO
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGGO costs 0.19% less per year.
- CGGO is significantly larger than EMM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMM covers emerging markets markets; CGGO covers global.
- EMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMM | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $58M | $10.1B |
| Since | 2010 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.76% | 1.88% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | global |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +60.4% | +38.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | +21.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 1.04 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.58% | 16.82% |
| Max drawdown | -21.99% | -24.90% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMM and CGGO
Explore further