Screener
EMM vs IEMG
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
Key differences
- IEMG costs 0.57% less per year.
- IEMG is significantly larger than EMM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMM follows a active selection strategy; IEMG uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, IEMG has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMM | IEMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.09% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $58M | $151.2B |
| Since | 2010 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 0.76% | 2.37% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +54.6% | +44.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.5% | +21.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.90 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.25% | 19.02% |
| Max drawdown | -21.99% | -38.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMM and IEMG
Explore further