Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EMM vs MEMX

Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

EMM

Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

Annual cost

0.66%

Fund size

$63M

MEMX

Matthews Emerging Markets Ex China Active ETF

Annual cost

0.79%

Fund size

$50M

Key differences

Both EMM and MEMX are equity ETFs. EMM charges 0.66% a year and MEMX 0.79%. The main difference: EMM costs 0.13% less per year.

  • EMM costs 0.13% less per year.
  • Over the last three years, MEMX has delivered higher annualized returns.
  • EMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

EMMMEMX
Annual cost (TER)0.66%0.79%
Fund size (AUM)$63M$50M
Since20102023
Dividend yield0.69%1.55%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionactive selection
CAGR 1Y+50.1%+56.3%
CAGR 3Y+21.1%+24.5%
CAGR 5YN/AN/A
Sharpe 3Y0.911.12
Volatility 1Y22.81%22.75%
Max drawdown-21.99%-19.27%

Similar to EMM and MEMX