Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

EMM vs SPEM

Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF

EMM

Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF

Global X Funds

Annual cost

0.66%

Fund size

$58M

SPEM

State Street SPDR Portfolio Emerging Markets ETF

State Street Investment Management

Annual cost

0.07%

Fund size

$17.3B

Key differences

  • SPEM costs 0.59% less per year.
  • SPEM is significantly larger than EMM — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • EMM follows a active selection strategy; SPEM uses index tracking.
  • Over the last 3 years, EMM has delivered higher annualized returns.

Side-by-side comparison

EMMSPEM
Annual cost (TER)0.66%0.07%
Fund size (AUM)$58M$17.3B
Since20102007
Dividend yield0.76%2.58%
Asset classequityequity
Regionemerging marketsemerging markets
Strategyactive selectionindex tracking
CAGR 1Y+54.6%+30.3%
CAGR 3Y+20.5%+19.0%
CAGR 5YN/A+6.6%
Sharpe 3Y0.900.95
Volatility 1Y21.25%15.88%
Max drawdown-21.99%-36.06%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to EMM and SPEM