Screener
EMM vs XC
Global X Emerging Markets ex-China ETF vs WisdomTree True Emerging Markets Fund
Key differences
- XC costs 0.34% less per year.
- EMM follows a active selection strategy; XC uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EMM has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMM | XC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.66% | 0.32% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $58M | $86M |
| Since | 2010 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 0.76% | 1.89% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +60.4% | +10.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.4% | +11.9% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.98 | 0.57 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.58% | 14.69% |
| Max drawdown | -21.99% | -20.97% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMM and XC
Explore further