Screener
EMMF vs DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund vs WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
Key differences
- EMMF costs 0.10% less per year.
- DGS is significantly larger than EMMF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMMF follows a active selection strategy; DGS uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, EMMF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- DGS has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMMF | DGS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.48% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $167M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2018 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 2.10% | 3.31% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +39.0% | +27.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +22.1% | +16.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +10.5% | +9.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.89 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.07% | 15.41% |
| Max drawdown | -32.57% | -44.08% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMMF and DGS
Explore further