Screener
EMOP vs REMG
AB Emerging Markets Opportunities ETF vs Russell Investments Emerging Markets Equity ETF
Key differences
- REMG costs 0.06% less per year.
- EMOP is significantly larger than REMG — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMOP follows a active selection strategy; REMG uses index tracking.
- EMOP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMOP | REMG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.64% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $1.9B | $95M |
| Since | 1995 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 1.64% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -12.87% | -14.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMOP and REMG
Explore further