Screener
EMPB vs CCOR
Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- CCOR costs 0.92% less per year.
- EMPB follows a active selection strategy; CCOR uses option income.
- CCOR has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMPB | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.21% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $28M |
| Since | 2024 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.5% | -4.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.41% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -7.55% | -22.99% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMPB and CCOR
Explore further