Screener
EMPB vs IJH
Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF vs iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- IJH costs 2.16% less per year.
- IJH is significantly larger than EMPB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMPB is classified as alternative, while IJH is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- EMPB follows a active selection strategy; IJH uses index tracking.
- IJH has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMPB | IJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.21% | 0.05% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $115.7B |
| Since | 2024 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 1.22% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.5% | +24.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +16.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.72 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.41% | 15.66% |
| Max drawdown | -7.55% | -42.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMPB and IJH
Explore further