Screener
EMPB vs IWL
Efficient Market Portfolio Plus ETF vs iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
Key differences
- IWL costs 2.06% less per year.
- IWL is significantly larger than EMPB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMPB is classified as alternative, while IWL is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- EMPB follows a active selection strategy; IWL uses index tracking.
- IWL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMPB | IWL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 2.21% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $18M | $2.1B |
| Since | 2024 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 0.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +21.5% | +30.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +24.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +14.7% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.28 |
| Volatility 1Y | 11.41% | 12.34% |
| Max drawdown | -7.55% | -32.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMPB and IWL
Explore further