Screener
EMSF vs EMXF
Matthews Emerging Markets Sustainable Future Active ETF vs iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
Key differences
- EMXF costs 0.63% less per year.
- EMXF is significantly larger than EMSF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMSF follows a active selection strategy; EMXF uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMSF | EMXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.79% | 0.16% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $44M | $148M |
| Since | 2023 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 5.21% | 3.03% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +64.8% | +45.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +21.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +8.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.01 |
| Volatility 1Y | 24.21% | 18.54% |
| Max drawdown | -24.75% | -33.13% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMSF and EMXF
Explore further