Screener
EMTL vs BWX
State Street DoubleLine Emerging Markets Fixed Income ETF vs State Street SPDR Bloomberg International Treasury Bond ETF
Key differences
- BWX costs 0.30% less per year.
- BWX is significantly larger than EMTL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMTL covers emerging markets markets; BWX covers global ex us.
- Over the last 3 years, EMTL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- BWX has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMTL | BWX | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.65% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $90M | $1.5B |
| Since | 2016 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 4.99% | 2.27% |
| Asset class | fixed income | fixed income |
| Region | emerging markets | global ex us |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +5.7% | -1.0% |
| CAGR 3Y | +6.8% | +0.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.7% | -4.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | -0.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 2.22% | 7.81% |
| Max drawdown | -22.91% | -34.00% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMTL and BWX
Explore further