Screener
EMXC vs EEMA
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF vs iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF
Key differences
- EMXC costs 0.24% less per year.
- EMXC is significantly larger than EEMA — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, EMXC has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EEMA has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMXC | EEMA | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.49% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22.1B | $1.3B |
| Since | 2017 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 1.28% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +65.4% | +46.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.1% | +22.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | 0.95 |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.14% | 19.95% |
| Max drawdown | -42.81% | -44.18% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMXC and EEMA
Explore further