Screener
EMXC vs XCNY
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China ETF vs State Street SPDR S&P Emerging Markets ex-China ETF
Key differences
- XCNY costs 0.06% less per year.
- EMXC is significantly larger than XCNY — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMXC has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMXC | XCNY | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.25% | 0.19% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $22.1B | $9M |
| Since | 2017 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 2.27% | 2.41% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +65.4% | +32.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +27.1% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | +12.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.25 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 21.14% | 16.39% |
| Max drawdown | -42.81% | -19.70% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMXC and XCNY
Explore further