Screener
EMXF vs PABU
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF vs iShares Paris-Aligned Climate Optimized MSCI USA ETF
Key differences
- PABU costs 0.06% less per year.
- PABU is significantly larger than EMXF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EMXF covers emerging markets markets; PABU covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, EMXF has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EMXF | PABU | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.16% | 0.10% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $148M | $2.3B |
| Since | 2020 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.03% | 0.93% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +45.9% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | +21.6% | +20.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +8.2% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.01 | 1.02 |
| Volatility 1Y | 18.54% | 13.38% |
| Max drawdown | -33.13% | -20.84% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EMXF and PABU
Explore further