Screener
ENDW vs GMOM
Cambria Endowment Style ETF vs Cambria Global Momentum ETF
Key differences
- ENDW costs 0.79% less per year.
- ENDW follows a multi strategy strategy; GMOM uses systematic alpha.
- GMOM has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENDW | GMOM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 1.01% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $139M | $140M |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | 2.21% | 1.58% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global | — |
| Strategy | multi strategy | systematic alpha |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.3% | +29.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +13.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +7.3% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 10.19% | 13.57% |
| Max drawdown | -6.44% | -19.93% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ENDW and GMOM
Explore further