Screener
ENFR vs AMUB
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF vs UBS ETRACS Alerian MLP Index ETN Series B
Key differences
- ENFR costs 0.45% less per year.
- ENFR is significantly larger than AMUB — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ENFR has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENFR | AMUB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.80% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $460M | $39M |
| Since | 2013 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 3.93% | 4.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.1% | +24.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | +28.8% | +23.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | +21.4% | +21.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 1.43 | 1.17 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.54% | 13.53% |
| Max drawdown | -62.64% | -73.46% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ENFR and AMUB
Explore further