Screener
ENHI vs BINC
iShares Enhanced International Active ETF vs iShares Flexible Income Active ETF
Key differences
- ENHI costs 0.13% less per year.
- BINC is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ENHI is classified as alternative, while BINC is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENHI | BINC | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $16.9B |
| Since | 2026 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | — | 5.60% |
| Asset class | alternative | fixed income |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +6.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 2.29% |
| Max drawdown | -5.65% | -2.69% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ENHI and BINC
Explore further