Screener
ENHI vs IOO
iShares Enhanced International Active ETF vs iShares Global 100 ETF
Key differences
- ENHI costs 0.13% less per year.
- IOO is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ENHI is classified as alternative, while IOO is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- ENHI follows a active selection strategy; IOO uses index tracking.
- IOO has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENHI | IOO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.40% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $8.5B |
| Since | 2026 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.86% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | global |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +40.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +16.9% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.32 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 13.63% |
| Max drawdown | -5.65% | -31.43% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ENHI and IOO
Explore further