Screener
ENHI vs MATE
iShares Enhanced International Active ETF vs Man Active Trend Enhanced ETF
Key differences
Both ENHI and MATE are alternative ETFs. ENHI charges 0.27% a year and MATE 0.97%. The main difference: ENHI follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- ENHI follows a active selection strategy; MATE uses tactical allocation.
- ENHI covers global markets excluding the US; MATE covers emerging markets.
- ENHI costs 0.70% less per year.
- MATE is much larger than ENHI. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENHI | MATE | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.97% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $39M |
| Since | 2026 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | — | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | global ex us | emerging markets |
| Strategy | active selection | tactical allocation |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | — |
| Max drawdown | -5.65% | -13.24% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.