Screener
ENHI vs MFSI
iShares Enhanced International Active ETF vs MFS Active International ETF
Key differences
- ENHI costs 0.32% less per year.
- MFSI is significantly larger than ENHI — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ENHI is classified as alternative, while MFSI is equity — different risk/return profiles.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENHI | MFSI | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.27% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $11M | $1.0B |
| Since | 2026 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.79% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | — | — |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +16.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 14.63% |
| Max drawdown | -5.65% | -13.67% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ENHI and MFSI
Explore further