Screener
ENHU vs ISTB
iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF vs iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
Key differences
- ISTB costs 0.16% less per year.
- ISTB is significantly larger than ENHU — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ENHU is classified as equity, while ISTB is fixed income — different risk/return profiles.
- ENHU follows a active selection strategy; ISTB uses index tracking.
- ISTB has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ENHU | ISTB | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.22% | 0.06% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $9M | $4.7B |
| Since | 2025 | 2012 |
| Dividend yield | — | 4.20% |
| Asset class | equity | fixed income |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +4.4% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +4.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +1.8% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 0.47 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 1.77% |
| Max drawdown | -8.98% | -9.34% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ENHU and ISTB
Explore further