Screener
EPMV vs CGUS
Harbor Mid Cap Value ETF vs Capital Group Core Equity ETF
Key differences
- CGUS costs 0.55% less per year.
- CGUS is significantly larger than EPMV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPMV follows a index tracking strategy; CGUS uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPMV | CGUS | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.33% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $4M | $10.3B |
| Since | 2025 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.90% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.8% | +27.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +23.0% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.27 |
| Volatility 1Y | 15.28% | 12.50% |
| Max drawdown | -8.78% | -22.15% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPMV and CGUS
Explore further