Screener
EPP vs CGGO
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF vs Capital Group Global Growth Equity ETF
Key differences
Both EPP and CGGO are equity ETFs. EPP charges 0.47% a year and CGGO 0.47%. The main difference: EPP follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- EPP follows a index tracking strategy; CGGO uses active selection.
- EPP covers the Asia-Pacific region; CGGO covers global markets.
- CGGO is much larger than EPP. Larger funds are usually more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last three years, CGGO has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EPP has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPP | CGGO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.47% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.1B | $11.3B |
| Since | 2001 | 2022 |
| Dividend yield | 3.43% | 1.71% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | asia pacific | global |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +12.0% | +29.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +13.1% | +20.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +4.0% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.60 | 0.98 |
| Volatility 1Y | 14.91% | 17.47% |
| Max drawdown | -39.30% | -24.90% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.