Screener
EPRF vs LJUL
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF vs Innovator Premium Income 15 Buffer ETF - July
Key differences
- EPRF costs 0.32% less per year.
- EPRF is significantly larger than LJUL — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPRF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPRF | LJUL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.79% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $9M |
| Since | 2016 | 2024 |
| Dividend yield | 6.08% | 5.25% |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | +5.7% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.59% | 1.58% |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -3.21% |
Similar to EPRF and LJUL
Explore further