Screener
EPRF vs XLII
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF vs State Street Industrial Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
Key differences
- XLII costs 0.12% less per year.
- EPRF is significantly larger than XLII — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPRF follows a structured outcome strategy; XLII uses option income.
- EPRF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPRF | XLII | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $3M |
| Since | 2016 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 6.08% | — |
| Asset class | alternative | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.5% | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.59% | — |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -10.10% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPRF and XLII
Explore further