Screener
EPRF vs XNTK
Innovator S&P Investment Grade Preferred ETF vs State Street SPDR NYSE Technology ETF
Key differences
- XNTK costs 0.12% less per year.
- XNTK is significantly larger than EPRF — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPRF is classified as alternative, while XNTK is equity — different risk/return profiles.
- EPRF follows a structured outcome strategy; XNTK uses index tracking.
- Over the last 3 years, XNTK has delivered higher annualized returns.
- XNTK has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPRF | XNTK | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.47% | 0.35% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $72M | $1.8B |
| Since | 2016 | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | 6.08% | 0.20% |
| Asset class | alternative | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | structured outcome | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +4.0% | +68.3% |
| CAGR 3Y | +4.0% | +42.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | -1.5% | +21.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.09 | 1.39 |
| Volatility 1Y | 7.59% | 23.12% |
| Max drawdown | -26.82% | -48.28% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPRF and XNTK
Explore further