Screener
EPSV vs BBHM
Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF vs BBH Select Mid Cap ETF
Key differences
- BBHM costs 0.07% less per year.
- BBHM is significantly larger than EPSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPSV follows a index tracking strategy; BBHM uses active selection.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPSV | BBHM | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.81% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $521M |
| Since | 2025 | 2021 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +47.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.87% | — |
| Max drawdown | -8.93% | -9.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPSV and BBHM
Explore further