Screener
EPSV vs GKAT
Harbor SMID Cap Value ETF vs Scharf Global Opportunity ETF
Key differences
- GKAT costs 0.29% less per year.
- GKAT is significantly larger than EPSV — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EPSV follows a index tracking strategy; GKAT uses active selection.
- GKAT has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPSV | GKAT | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.88% | 0.59% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $5M | $158M |
| Since | 2025 | 2014 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.46% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | — |
| Strategy | index tracking | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +47.2% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 17.87% | — |
| Max drawdown | -8.93% | -10.41% |
Similar to EPSV and GKAT
Explore further