Screener
EPV vs EFO
ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe vs ProShares Ultra MSCI EAFE
Key differences
- EPV follows a inverse strategy; EFO uses leveraged.
- Over the last 3 years, EFO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| EPV | EFO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.95% | 0.95% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $14M | $30M |
| Since | 2009 | 2009 |
| Dividend yield | 4.69% | 1.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | europe | europe |
| Strategy | inverse | leveraged |
| CAGR 1Y | -30.7% | +39.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | -24.4% | +22.7% |
| CAGR 5Y | -19.6% | +9.0% |
| Sharpe 3Y | -0.85 | 0.71 |
| Volatility 1Y | 31.30% | 30.85% |
| Max drawdown | -93.61% | -63.52% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EPV and EFO
Explore further