Screener
EQLT vs EMGF
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF vs iShares Emerging Markets Equity Factor ETF
Key differences
- EMGF costs 0.09% less per year.
- EMGF is significantly larger than EQLT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EQLT follows a index tracking strategy; EMGF uses index enhanced.
- Over the last 3 years, EMGF has delivered higher annualized returns.
- EMGF has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EQLT | EMGF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.26% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $1.7B |
| Since | 2024 | 2015 |
| Dividend yield | 1.79% | 2.15% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | emerging markets |
| Strategy | index tracking | index enhanced |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.2% | +46.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.6% | +24.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.6% | +10.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.12 | 1.15 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.62% | 19.44% |
| Max drawdown | -43.63% | -40.23% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EQLT and EMGF
Explore further