Screener
EQLT vs FQAL
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Quality Factor ETF vs Fidelity Quality Factor ETF
Key differences
- FQAL costs 0.20% less per year.
- FQAL is significantly larger than EQLT — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- EQLT covers emerging markets markets; FQAL covers north america.
- Over the last 3 years, FQAL has delivered higher annualized returns.
- FQAL has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| EQLT | FQAL | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.35% | 0.15% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $12M | $1.4B |
| Since | 2024 | 2016 |
| Dividend yield | 1.79% | 1.16% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | emerging markets | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +53.2% | +22.6% |
| CAGR 3Y | +2.6% | +20.8% |
| CAGR 5Y | +1.6% | +12.4% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.12 | 1.18 |
| Volatility 1Y | 20.62% | 11.34% |
| Max drawdown | -43.63% | -33.71% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to EQLT and FQAL
Explore further