Screener
ERX vs FAZ
Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares vs Direxion Daily Financial Bear 3X Shares
Key differences
- ERX costs 0.12% less per year.
- ERX follows a leveraged strategy; FAZ uses inverse.
- Over the last 3 years, ERX has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ERX | FAZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.91% | 1.03% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $282M | $120M |
| Since | 2008 | 2008 |
| Dividend yield | 1.54% | 3.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | leveraged | inverse |
| CAGR 1Y | +103.0% | -9.8% |
| CAGR 3Y | +26.2% | -38.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | +30.3% | -27.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.68 | -0.84 |
| Volatility 1Y | 40.54% | 43.24% |
| Max drawdown | -98.59% | -99.78% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ERX and FAZ
Explore further