Screener
ESLG vs IWF
Eventide Large Cap Growth ETF vs iShares Russell 1000 Growth ETF
Key differences
- ESLG follows a active selection strategy; IWF uses index tracking.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESLG | IWF | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | — | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | — | $124.7B |
| Since | — | 2000 |
| Dividend yield | — | 0.35% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | N/A | +27.5% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | +26.4% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | +15.5% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | 1.13 |
| Volatility 1Y | — | 15.55% |
| Max drawdown | -12.36% | -32.72% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ESLG and IWF
Explore further