Screener
ESML vs XJH
iShares ESG Aware MSCI USA Small-Cap ETF vs iShares ESG Select Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF
Key differences
- XJH costs 0.05% less per year.
- ESML is significantly larger than XJH — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ESML has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESML | XJH | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.17% | 0.12% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $2.3B | $372M |
| Since | 2018 | 2020 |
| Dividend yield | 0.99% | 1.14% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +34.4% | +25.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +17.5% | +15.6% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.1% | +7.1% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.74 | 0.69 |
| Volatility 1Y | 16.76% | 16.42% |
| Max drawdown | -41.97% | -25.07% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ESML and XJH
Explore further