Screener
ESN vs BCHP
Essential 40 Stock ETF vs Principal Focused Blue Chip ETF
Key differences
Both ESN and BCHP are equity ETFs. ESN charges 0.70% a year and BCHP 0.58%. The main difference: BCHP costs 0.12% less per year.
- BCHP costs 0.12% less per year.
- ESN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESN | BCHP | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.58% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $279M | $230M |
| Since | 2014 | 2023 |
| Dividend yield | 0.78% | 0.00% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +27.0% | +0.9% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.94% | 16.32% |
| Max drawdown | -13.59% | -18.56% |
Beyond the comparison: Beacon helps you build, track, and project a portfolio with the ETFs you pick.