Screener
ESN vs CCOR
Essential 40 Stock ETF vs Core Alternative ETF
Key differences
- ESN costs 0.59% less per year.
- ESN is significantly larger than CCOR — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ESN is classified as equity, while CCOR is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ESN follows a active selection strategy; CCOR uses option income.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESN | CCOR | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 1.29% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $249M | $28M |
| Since | 2014 | 2017 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 1.08% |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | option income |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | -5.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | -2.5% |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | -2.2% |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | -0.56 |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.80% | 6.92% |
| Max drawdown | -13.59% | -22.99% |
Similar to ESN and CCOR
Explore further