Screener
ESN vs FELV
Essential 40 Stock ETF vs Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Value ETF
Key differences
- FELV costs 0.52% less per year.
- FELV is significantly larger than ESN — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ESN follows a active selection strategy; FELV uses index tracking.
- FELV has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESN | FELV | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.18% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $249M | $2.9B |
| Since | 2014 | 2007 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | 1.58% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | +31.2% |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.80% | 10.82% |
| Max drawdown | -13.59% | -16.08% |
Similar to ESN and FELV
Explore further