Screener
ESN vs WZRD
Essential 40 Stock ETF vs Opportunistic Trader ETF
Key differences
- ESN costs 0.30% less per year.
- ESN is significantly larger than WZRD — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- ESN is classified as equity, while WZRD is alternative — different risk/return profiles.
- ESN follows a active selection strategy; WZRD uses structured outcome.
- ESN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESN | WZRD | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 1.00% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $249M | $4M |
| Since | 2014 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | — |
| Asset class | equity | alternative |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | structured outcome |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.80% | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.59% | -71.81% |
Similar to ESN and WZRD
Explore further