Screener
ESN vs XCHG
Essential 40 Stock ETF vs Ab US Equity ETF
Key differences
- XCHG costs 0.20% less per year.
- ESN has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESN | XCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.70% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $249M | $685M |
| Since | 2014 | 2025 |
| Dividend yield | 0.82% | — |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | north america | north america |
| Strategy | active selection | active selection |
| CAGR 1Y | +29.5% | N/A |
| CAGR 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| CAGR 5Y | N/A | N/A |
| Sharpe 3Y | N/A | N/A |
| Volatility 1Y | 9.80% | — |
| Max drawdown | -13.59% | -9.67% |
Similar to ESN and XCHG
Explore further