Screener
ESPO vs HERO
VanEck Video Gaming and eSports ETF vs Global X Video Games & Esports ETF
Key differences
- HERO costs 0.05% less per year.
- ESPO is significantly larger than HERO — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
- Over the last 3 years, ESPO has delivered higher annualized returns.
Side-by-side comparison
| ESPO | HERO | |
|---|---|---|
| Annual cost (TER) | 0.55% | 0.50% |
| Fund size (AUM) | $257M | $71M |
| Since | 2018 | 2019 |
| Dividend yield | 1.40% | 1.82% |
| Asset class | equity | equity |
| Region | — | north america |
| Strategy | index tracking | index tracking |
| CAGR 1Y | -9.7% | -10.1% |
| CAGR 3Y | +20.1% | +9.1% |
| CAGR 5Y | +7.2% | -2.6% |
| Sharpe 3Y | 0.80 | 0.35 |
| Volatility 1Y | 19.07% | 19.61% |
| Max drawdown | -50.99% | -54.02% |
Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.
Similar to ESPO and HERO
Explore further