Skip to content
Beacon
Screener

ETHT vs EFZ

Proshares Ultra Ether ETF vs ProShares Short MSCI EAFE

ETHT

Proshares Ultra Ether ETF

ProShares

Annual cost

0.94%

Fund size

$250M

EFZ

ProShares Short MSCI EAFE

ProShares

Annual cost

0.95%

Fund size

$16M

Key differences

  • ETHT is significantly larger than EFZ — larger funds tend to be more liquid and less likely to close.
  • ETHT is classified as cryptocurrency, while EFZ is equity — different risk/return profiles.
  • ETHT follows a leveraged strategy; EFZ uses inverse.
  • EFZ has a longer track record, which may reduce uncertainty around long-term behavior.

Side-by-side comparison

ETHTEFZ
Annual cost (TER)0.94%0.95%
Fund size (AUM)$250M$16M
Since20242007
Dividend yield10.41%3.97%
Asset classcryptocurrencyequity
Regionglobal ex us
Strategyleveragedinverse
CAGR 1Y-67.7%-15.6%
CAGR 3YN/A-9.5%
CAGR 5YN/A-6.2%
Sharpe 3YN/A-0.79
Volatility 1Y136.35%16.44%
Max drawdown-93.10%-61.90%

Green dot indicates the better value for that metric. Performance data is historical and does not predict future results.

Similar to ETHT and EFZ